Note: You are reading this message either because you can not see our css files, or because you do not have a standards-compliant browser.

LOGO: Journal of Cotton Science

 

Current Issue

Normalized yield response by cotton planting week (1990 to 2023) in Arkansas production systems.  In general, yield penalties are sensitive to both planting and harvest timing.

FEATURED ARTICLE


Economics and Marketing
Estimating Cotton Yield Response Surface to Planting and Harvest Dates in Arkansas
Terry Griffin and Bill Robertson
Pages: 173-184
DOI: (https://doi.org/10.56454/JXVX3087)
Normalized yield response by cotton planting week (1990 to 2023) in Arkansas production systems. In general, yield penalties are sensitive to both planting and harvest timing.

 Issue Editors
Agronomy and Soils
Cotton Irrigation Scheduling: Which Approach is the Best Fit for Georgia?
Miller W. Hayes, Wesley M. Porter, John L. Snider, Kaylyn G. Reagin, and Calvin D. Perry
Pages: 136-144
DOI: (https://doi.org/10.56454/IOAG2877)

Agronomy and Soils
Effects of Different Cover Crops and Cotton Planting Rates on Cotton Production in a No-Till System
Ted S. Kornecki, Corey M. Kichler, and Trent A. Morton
Pages: 145-156
DOI: (https://doi.org/10.56454/LTCK1756)

Economics and Marketing
Profitability of Using Advanced Irrigation Scheduling Methods for Cotton Production
Anukul Bhattarai, Yanguan Liu, Vasileios Laikos, Amanda Smith, and George Vellidis
Pages: 157-172
DOI: (https://doi.org/10.56454/FUOA6071)

Plant Pathology and Nematology
Comparative Pathogenicity of Meloidogyne enterolobii and Meloidogyne incognita in Cotton Cultivars
Guilherme Lafourcade Asmus, Rafael Galbieri, André Luiz Xavier de Araujo, and Jean-Louis Belot
Pages: 185-196
DOI: (https://doi.org/10.56454/XFBG9925)